Ads
related to: hf1986 100 watt equivalent cfl1000bulbs.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the 1970s, 34-watt energy-saving F40T12 fluorescent lamps were intoroduced in the United States. In the 1980s, T8 32-watt lamps were introduced, [8] but unlike the T8 tubes introduced in Europe, these T8s are not retrofits and require new matching ballasts to drive them. These ballasts were originally magnetic, but most today are electronic.
While the purchase price of a CFL is typically 3–10 times greater than that of an equivalent incandescent lamp, a CFL lasts 8–15 times longer and uses two-thirds to three-quarters less energy. A US article stated "A household that invested $90 in changing 30 fixtures to CFLs would save $440 to $1,500 over the five-year life of the bulbs ...
The 2009 IECC, chapter 2 defines high efficacy lamps as compact fluorescent lamps, T-8 or smaller diameter linear fluorescent lamps, or lamps with a minimum efficacy of: [21] 60 lumens per watt for lamps > 40 watts, 50 lumens per watt for lamps > 15 watts and ≤ 40 watts, and; 40 lumens per watt for lamps < 15 watts
Looking at the maths, if 90% of a 60 W bulb goes as heat, then it produces 6 W of visible light. If 30% of the equivalent CFL's energy input is converted to heat, then it produces 7.7 W of visible light. Yet our table says that the first produces 700 lm and the latter only 660 lm. There are clearly discrepancies here.
The efficacy of fluorescent tubes ranges from about 16 lumens per watt for a 4 watt tube with an ordinary ballast to over 100 lumens per watt [51] with a modern electronic ballast, commonly averaging 50 to 67 lm/W overall. [52] Ballast loss can be about 25% of the lamp power with magnetic ballasts, and around 10% with electronic ballasts.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Ads
related to: hf1986 100 watt equivalent cfl1000bulbs.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month