enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Honest services fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud

    Honest services fraud is a crime defined in 18 U.S.C. § 1346 (the federal mail and wire fraud statute), added by the United States Congress in 1988. [1] The idea of this law was to criminalize not only schemes to defraud victims of money and property, but also schemes to defraud victims of intangible rights such as the "honest services" of a public official.

  3. Federal prosecution of public corruption in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_prosecution_of...

    While several early cases employed the "intangible right to honest government," United States v. States (8th Cir. 1973) [9] was the first case to rely on honest services fraud as the sole basis for a conviction. [10] The prosecution of state and local political corruption became a "major federal law enforcement priority" in the 1970s. [11 ...

  4. List of United States federal officials convicted of ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The first type are also applicable to corrupt state and local officials: [1] the mail and wire fraud statutes (enacted 1872), including the honest services fraud provision, [2] the Hobbs Act (enacted 1934), [3] the Travel Act (enacted 1961), [4] and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) (enacted 1970).

  5. Percoco v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percoco_v._United_States

    Percoco v. United States, 598 U.S. 319, is a 2023 United States Supreme Court case regarding the federal honest services fraud statute. In the case, the Court held that a private citizen with significant influence over government decision-making cannot be convicted of honest services fraud for actions taken while not holding public office.

  6. McNally v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McNally_v._United_States

    McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350 (1987), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court decided that the federal statute criminalizing mail fraud applied only to the schemes and artifices defrauding victims of money or property, as opposed to those defrauding citizens of their rights to good government.

  7. McDonnell v. United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/McDonnell_v._United_States

    The ruling narrowed the legal definition of public corruption and made it harder for prosecutors to prove that a political official engaged in bribery. [ 4 ] [ 5 ] The term "official act" does not occur in the statutes charged in the case; rather, the parties to the trial had agreed that they would use the definition of that term given in the ...

  8. Examining the Evidence in Donald Trump’s Hush Money Trial - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/examining-evidence-donald-trump...

    Cohen was a lawyer and it’s not a problem if a law firm, for example, hires an expert witness for your trial and bills it back to you as an expense for legal services.

  9. Category:Honest services fraud - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Honest_services_fraud

    Honest services fraud case law (3 P) P. People convicted of honest services fraud (1 C, 11 P) Pages in category "Honest services fraud" The following 2 pages are in ...