Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
A ruling from Ohio's 10th District Court of Appeals may help thousands of Ohioans with suspended driver's licenses get behind the wheel again legally.
Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 (1976) is available from: Google Scholar Justia Library of Congress Oyez (oral argument audio) This article related to the Supreme Court of the United States is a stub . You can help Wikipedia by expanding it .
This page was last edited on 15 January 2025, at 22:33 (UTC).; Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License; additional terms may apply.
Beck v. Ohio, 379 U.S. 89 (1964), is a United States Supreme Court decision concerning evidence obtained as part of an unlawful arrest. Reversing the Ohio Supreme Court's decision, the U.S. Supreme Court held that Ohio police arrested defendant without probable cause, so the criminally-punishable evidence found on his person during an incidental search was inadmissible.
(The Center Square) – After nearly a year in the Ohio Legislature, a bill limiting driver’s license suspension to driving violations is only a signature from Gov. Mike DeWine away from ...
Then it'll be considered by the Ohio House. How does Ohio's driver's license amnesty program work? The driver's license amnesty program, which started as a pilot project in 2018, has forgiven more ...
In jurisprudence, prosecutorial misconduct or prosecutorial overreach is "an illegal act or failing to act, on the part of a prosecutor, especially an attempt to sway the jury to wrongly convict a defendant or to impose a harsher than appropriate punishment." [1] It is similar to selective prosecution. Prosecutors are bound by a set of rules ...
Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.