Ad
related to: georgia county unit law and court cases search and seizure act illinoiscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- County Court Records
Easily Search Court Records Online
Just Enter A Name & Choose A State
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- State Court Record Search
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Case history; Prior: 58 Ill. App. 3d 57, 373 N. E. 2d 1013: Holding; When a search warrant specifies the person or people named in the warrant to be searched and the things to be seized, there is no authority to search others not named in the warrant, unless the warrant specifically mentions that the unnamed parties are involved in criminal activity or exigent circumstances are clearly shown.
Bailey v. United States, 568 U.S. 186 (2013), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning search and seizure. [1] A 6–3 decision reversed the weapons conviction of a Long Island man who had been detained when police followed his vehicle after he left his apartment just before it was to be searched.
Search and seizure of an airline passenger walking through an airport Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear Energy: 460 U.S. 766 (1983) Environmental law; psychological effects do not need to be evaluated as part of an Environmental Impact Report: Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. Commissioner: 460 U.S. 575 (1983)
Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103 (2006), is a case in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that without a search warrant, police had no constitutional right to search a house where one resident consents to the search while another resident objects.
A search of the Gates' residence led to the discovery of additional marijuana and weapons. The Illinois Circuit Court decided that the search was unlawful based on the test established in the Supreme Court ruling in Spinelli v. United States. In essence, the affidavit did not provide enough evidence to establish probable cause, which led to the ...
wiretapping as search and seizure Zschernig v. Miller: 389 U.S. 429 (1968) foreign relations and state property law preventing inheritance by nonresident aliens: Mora v. McNamara: 389 U.S. 934 (1967) denial of certiorari in a case questioning the legality of the Vietnam War: Haynes v. United States: 390 U.S. 85 (1968)
Most courts of appeal to pass judgment on the issue—namely, the 1st, 2nd, 6th, 7th, and 11th circuits —have held that, once an item is seized, law enforcement can retain the item indefinitely ...
United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90 (2006), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States involving the constitutionality of "anticipatory" search warrants under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled that such warrants, which are issued in advance of a "triggering condition" that makes them ...
Ad
related to: georgia county unit law and court cases search and seizure act illinoiscourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month