Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States.It ruled that the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms—unconnected with service in a militia—for traditionally lawful purposes such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and ...
Antonin Scalia’s disastrous ruling in District of Columbia v. Heller created a constitutional Frankenstein, historian writes. Replace Second Amendment with one that makes sense in the blood ...
Scalia's opinion for the Heller Court was criticized by liberals and applauded by conservatives. [115] Seventh Circuit judge Richard Posner disagreed with Scalia's opinion, stating that the Second Amendment "creates no right to the private possession of guns".
Bench opinions = 24: ... Scalia dissented from the Court's denial of an application to vacate a stay of execution. ... Heller: 554 U.S. 570 (2008)
In the Heller decision, the court's majority opinion said that the Second Amendment protects "the right of law-abiding, responsible citizens to use arms in defense of hearth and home." However, in delivering the majority opinion, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia wrote on the Second Amendment not being an unlimited right:
Scalia filed a statement respecting the Court's denial of certiorari, commenting on the reliance by the Solicitor General's supplemental brief on United States v. Resendiz-Ponce , 549 U.S. 102 (2007) to argue that the omission of a necessary element from an indictment of fraud was not constitutionally deficient.
Scalia believed both formal and informal agency decisions should receive deference from the courts, and predicted that the consequences of the court’s decision “will be enormous, and almost ...
2015 term United States Supreme Court opinions of Antonin Scalia This page was last edited on 31 December 2009, at 10:18 (UTC). Text ...