enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Turner v. Rogers - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turner_v._Rogers

    The federal agency responsible for enforcing child support is the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE). [9] In response to the Turner decision, OCSE responded that states should review their procedures to ensure that the proceedings are fair by giving the obligor-parents an opportunity to provide and respond to questions regarding their ...

  3. Zablocki v. Redhail - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zablocki_v._Redhail

    Redhail, 434 U.S. 374 (1978), was a U.S. Supreme Court decision that held that Wisconsin Statutes §§ 245.10 (1), (4), (5) (1973) violated the Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause. [1] Section 245.10 required noncustodial parents who were Wisconsin residents attempting to marry inside or outside of Wisconsin to seek a court order prior ...

  4. Hermesmann v. Seyer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermesmann_v._Seyer

    Hermesmann v. Seyer (State of Kansas ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer, 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993)) [1] was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States, case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.

  5. Child support in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_support_in_the...

    Most courts addressing the issue of imprisonment for child support deficiencies since the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Lassiter vs Department of Social Services, 452 U.S. 18 (1981) have held that appointed counsel is required if the obligor's liberty is at stake. In March 2006, the Supreme Court of New Jersey, upheld this principle ...

  6. My ex refuses to support our kids — can I access his 401(k ...

    www.aol.com/ex-refuses-support-kids-access...

    The judge cited a circuit court ruling that she was entitled to a percentage of his pension based on every year of their marriage (13). The sailor refused to pay when he retired, forcing her to ...

  7. Santosky v. Kramer - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santosky_v._Kramer

    Santosky v. Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982), is a Supreme Court case involving the burden of proof for the revocation of parental rights.The case arose when the Ulster County, New York, Department of Social Services sought to revoke John Santosky II and Annie Santosky's parental rights to their three children.

  8. Court voids ruling that sperm donor must pay child support - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/court-voids-ruling-sperm-donor...

    When it comes to deciding whether a sperm donor should pay child support, a judge should follow the paternity laws of the state where the child is conceived, a North Carolina appeals court ruled ...

  9. Supreme Court to decide if families can opt out of reading ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-decide-families...

    The Supreme Court will decide if ... the Supreme Court made the decision they will weigh in on the matter. ... We don’t have to understand or support a person’s identity to treat them with ...