Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Reverting a contribution is sometimes appropriate. However, reverting good-faith actions of other editors can also be disruptive and may lead to the reverter being temporarily blocked from editing. The three-revert rule (part of the edit warring policy) limits the number of times an editor can revert edits (including partial reversions) on a page.
Edit wars tend to cause ill-will, delay editor development, and reduce editor retention. An editor can feel a revert is "a slap in the face" – "I worked hard and someone reverted it!" Edit wars do waste space in the database, make the page history less useful, and flood recent-change lists and watchlists.
Restoring part of a reverted edit is a recommended practice in online collaborative writing.. Often when an article version contains more than one disagreeable passage, it is easy to revert to a previous version.
There's one advantage to using the classic revert: Unlike an undo, with a revert it's impossible to have an edit conflict (see the section about edit conflicts). If you're reverting vandalism on a high-traffic page (today's featured article on the Main Page is a prominent example), an edit conflict could significantly slow your fixing of some ...
Undo is an interaction technique which is implemented in many computer programs. It erases the last change done to the document, reverting it to an older state. In some more advanced programs, such as graphic processing, undo will negate the last command done to the file being edited.
Click the (undo) link at the top right, in the "revision as of" line Go back to the edit history and click undo. Scroll to the edit summary box and add "reverting vandalism" or something similar to the automatic summary. Click Show preview to make sure your edit removes the vandalism as intended. Click Publish changes, and pat yourself on the back!
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
No edit, reversion or not, should be made for the purpose of teaching another editor a lesson or keeping an editor from enjoying the fruits of their crimes. Do not revert an edit as a means of showing your disapproval of the edit summary. Do not revert an edit because you need more time to determine whether you agree with the edit.