enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Students_for_Fair...

    Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito have opposed affirmative action; the remaining three conservative justices had no track record of opposing affirmative action prior to the ruling, although a 1999 article Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in The Wall Street Journal signaled he would end it. The liberal Sotomayor has repeatedly and proudly ...

  3. What to Know About the Supreme Court Overturning College ...

    www.aol.com/know-supreme-court-overturning...

    The Supreme Court's recent ruling to overturn affirmative action means that Colleges and universities can no longer consider race in admission policies. Here how the ruling affects students.

  4. SCOTUS affirmative action ruling: Why experts, activists say ...

    www.aol.com/news/scotus-affirmative-action...

    A recent poll from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research found that over 60% of Americans are in favor of affirmative action in college admissions and don’t support ...

  5. Supreme Court strikes down college affirmative action programs

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-strikes-down...

    The vote was 6-3 in the UNC case and 6-2 in ... would apply first to those starting college in 2028 and that the decision therefore did not conflict with the 2003 ruling. Affirmative action, ...

  6. GOP senator presses colleges to comply with Supreme Court ...

    www.aol.com/news/gop-senator-presses-colleges...

    In response to the court's ruling, which focused on the affirmative action programs at the University of North Carolina and Harvard, Harvard reaffirmed their commitment to “the fundamental ...

  7. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Roberts Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    The Fifth Circuit failed to apply strict scrutiny when it affirmed the University of Texas's affirmative action policy. The decision is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration. United States v. Windsor: 12-307: 2013-06-26 Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional, as it violates due process and equal ...

  8. Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleur - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cleveland_Board_of...

    This decision was a major step in protecting the rights of teachers, especially female teachers, from unfair prejudicial rules which would keep them from the profession of teaching. This decision also plays a critical role in the professionalization of teaching by protecting all teachers from arbitrary, political regulations which serve no ...

  9. Affirmative action: What to know about the Supreme Court cases

    www.aol.com/news/affirmative-action-know-supreme...

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday is hearing two major cases that could determine the future of race-based affirmative action in higher education across America. While 40 years of legal precedent ...