Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Another case where the re-revert may be necessary is when an incumbent editor reverts without justification in the edit summary, which is a form WP:Status quo stonewalling. But see WP:QUO . Sometimes bold, revert, revert may function as a form of bold, refine (see above), particularly among editors who already have a positive working relationship.
A reversion is an edit, or part of an edit, that completely reverses a prior edit, restoring at least part of an article to what it was before the prior edit.
BRRR go brrrrrrrrr. The BOLD, revert, revert, revert cycle (BRRR) is a proactive method for forcing the version of an article that you prefer.It is a cross between the Gaming the system process and "Ignore all rules", and it is particularly useful for upsetting your opponents that object to your edits, initiating escalation, keeping discussion from ever moving forward, and ensuring that ...
Logged-in users will also see a "Revert" link for versions other than the current one. Click on a Revert link to make the change. If the image is at Wikimedia Commons you must click through to the image page there to do the revert. Then scroll down to the thumbnails. Beside the thumbnail you wish there will be the word "Revert".
WP:WHILE these MOS:ABBRs are WP:GREAT for WP:RDRing to a WP:SPECIFIC WP:PAGE WP:YOU WP:USE often, it's probably a WP:BADIDEA to make a WP:POINT of using these TLAs in daily WP:TALK, lest your WP:DISCUSSion end up as WP:NONSENSE WP:LIKE the WP:TITLE of this page.
So, you revert the person, and they revert you too, with edit summaries containing, "There's no consensus! Stop edit-warring, I declare! See the talkpage!" The key to dealing with a filibusterer is to point out that they're filibustering and to ignore them. If they continue reverting, put in an RfC or report them for edit-warring on WP:ANEW ...
It seems some WP contributors make very expansive application of what constitutes a "revert" and this expansive application, combined with a strategy of "block first, ask questions later (or never)" can result in prejudicial outcomes against contributors who are entirely acting in good faith, willing to discuss and substantiate their actions ...
Wikipedia:What editors mean when they say you have to follow BRD is a completely different thing, and what people usually mean already is in the formal policies (specifically WP:EW and WP:EPTALK). Also, the reason this isn't a policy is because experienced editors rejected it.