Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The null hypothesis of this chi-squared test is homoscedasticity, and the alternative hypothesis would indicate heteroscedasticity. Since the Breusch–Pagan test is sensitive to departures from normality or small sample sizes, the Koenker–Bassett or 'generalized Breusch–Pagan' test is commonly used instead.
In statistics, Bartlett's test, named after Maurice Stevenson Bartlett, [1] is used to test homoscedasticity, that is, if multiple samples are from populations with equal variances. [2] Some statistical tests, such as the analysis of variance , assume that variances are equal across groups or samples, which can be checked with Bartlett's test.
In statistics, the Glejser test for heteroscedasticity, developed in 1969 by Herbert Glejser, regresses the residuals on the explanatory variable that is thought to be related to the heteroscedastic variance. [1]
Levene's test assesses this assumption. It tests the null hypothesis that the population variances are equal (called homogeneity of variance or homoscedasticity ). If the resulting p -value of Levene's test is less than some significance level (typically 0.05), the obtained differences in sample variances are unlikely to have occurred based on ...
If the test statistic has a p-value below an appropriate threshold (e.g. p < 0.05) then the null hypothesis of homoskedasticity is rejected and heteroskedasticity assumed. If the Breusch–Pagan test shows that there is conditional heteroskedasticity, one could either use weighted least squares (if the source of heteroskedasticity is known) or ...
Assumptions, parametric and non-parametric: There are two groups of statistical tests, parametric and non-parametric. The choice between these two groups needs to be justified. The choice between these two groups needs to be justified.
The claim: California counting ballots two weeks after Election Day is evidence it was ‘rigged’ A Nov. 19 Instagram post (direct link, archive link) claims one state’s lengthy vote-counting ...
[citation needed] The BG test is considered to be more general than the Ljung-Box test because the latter requires the assumption of strict exogeneity, but the BG test does not. However, the BG test requires the assumptions of stronger forms of predeterminedness and conditional homoscedasticity .