enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Board_of_Education_of_the...

    Board of Education of District of Columbia (1972) – found a right to education for children with disabilities on the basis of due process and equal protection. [1] A 1974 investigation by Congress found that more than 1.75 million children with disabilities received no public education and that another 3 million who did attend school did not ...

  3. Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luna_Perez_v._Sturgis...

    Luna Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools, 598 U.S. 142 (2023), [1] was a United States Supreme Court decision in which the Court held that an Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for denial of a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) can proceed without exhausting the administrative procedures of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA ...

  4. Mills v. Board of Education of District of Columbia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mills_v._Board_of...

    Additionally, subsection b(2) describes a case with refusal of the opposing party to rectify the transgression to a degree that merits corrective adjudication. [5] This was a broad interpretation of the 14th Amendment due process clause of law and was used to make changes to local school district policy. [6]

  5. List of landmark court decisions in the United States

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_landmark_court...

    Moore v. Dempsey, 261 U.S. 86 (1923) Mob violence at criminal trials, such as those that followed the Elaine Race Riot, is a violation of due process. First 20th-century case where the Court protected the rights of Blacks in the South, and one of its first to review a criminal conviction for constitutionality. Sorrells v.

  6. Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens v ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Association...

    Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC) v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E.D. Pa. 1971), was a case where the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania was sued by the Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Citizens (PARC), now The Arc of Pennsylvania, over a law that gave public schools the authority to deny a free education to children who had reached the age of 8, yet had ...

  7. Schaffer v. Weast - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schaffer_v._Weast

    Weast, [1] 546 U.S. 49 (2005), is a Supreme Court case that determined that the burden of proof belonged to whoever challenged an Individualized Education Program (IEP). Weast revised the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) which had introduced IEPs as a method of ensuring an individual and effective education for disabled students.

  8. New Title IX Rules Erase Campus Due Process Protections - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/title-ix-rules-erase-campus...

    In 2020, the Trump administration introduced broad due process rights for accused students while prohibiting schools from taking many cases that occurred off-campus.

  9. Goss v. Lopez - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goss_v._Lopez

    It held that the state had violated due process by suspending the students without a hearing. The state had made education a fundamental right by providing for free public education for all residents between 5 and 21. The Court stated that protected interests are created not by the Constitution but by its institutions (Board of Regents v. Roth).