Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
As stated in Brewer v.Williams, 430 U.S. 387 (1977), the right to counsel "means at least that a person is entitled to the help of a lawyer at or after the time that judicial proceedings have been initiated against him, 'whether by way of formal charge, preliminary hearing, indictment, information, or arraignment. ' " [2] Brewer goes on to conclude that once adversarial proceedings have begun ...
A Marsden motion is the only means by which a criminal defendant can fire a court-appointed attorney or communicate directly with a judge in a California state court. [1] It is based on a defendant's claim that the attorney is providing ineffective assistance or has a conflict with the defendant.
Attorneys may have also been ineffective if they had a conflict of interest that was "inherently prejudicial." [24] Such claims arise under the Cuyler [25] doctrine, which makes prejudice somewhat easier to demonstrate than ordinary Strickland claims. Attorneys may be conflicted when they are simultaneously representing multiple people with ...
Search the web. Legal Main; Terms of Service Summary; Terms of Service; Legal Information Privacy Policy. Privacy Policy Highlights
The joint defense privilege, or common-interest rule, is an extension of attorney–client privilege. [1] Under "common interest" or "joint defense" doctrine, parties with shared interest in actual or potential litigation against a common adversary may share privileged information without waiving their right to assert attorney–client privilege. [2]
Indianapolis New Albany: 1943 1984–2014 1994–2000 2014–present Reagan: 11 Senior Judge Richard L. Young: Evansville Indianapolis: 1953 1998–2023 2009–2016 2023–present Clinton: 12 Senior Judge William T. Lawrence: inactive: 1947 2008–2018 — 2018–present G.W. Bush: 13 Senior Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson: Indianapolis Terre Haute ...
Civil law countries still have significant disqualification privileges, whereas common law countries, such as England, went in a different direction where recusal was required less often. [1] This included the United States, which inherited a system where only judges with a direct financial interest in a case had to recuse themselves.
[61] [62] [63] In the United States, a law firm usually cannot represent a client if the client's interests conflict with those of another client, even if the two clients are represented by separate lawyers within the firm, unless (in some jurisdictions) the lawyer is segregated from the rest of the firm for the duration of the conflict. Law ...