Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Physiological Reviews is a journal published quarterly by the American Physiological Society which has been published since 1921. [1]: 75 [2] [3] The editor in chief of the journal is Sadis Matalon (University of Alabama at Birmingham). [4] [5] The journal's first managing editor, who served to his death in 1946, was Dr. Donald R. Hooker.
If you are in the process of reviewing a submission, please mark the submission "under review". This changes the visible submission template, alerting other reviewers that someone is reviewing the submission, which reduces occurrence of edit conflicts. When using the script, simply select Mark as reviewing from the Review tab.
The Annual Review of Physiology is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes review articles about physiology. First published in 1939 through a collaboration between the American Physiological Society and Annual Reviews , it was published solely by Annual Reviews after 1962.
The PRISMA flow diagram, depicting the flow of information through the different phases of a systematic review. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) is an evidence-based minimum set of items aimed at helping scientific authors to report a wide array of systematic reviews and meta-analyses, primarily used to assess the benefits and harms of a health care ...
This is a list of publishers of academic journals by their submission policies regarding the use of preprints prior to publication (example list). Publishers' policies on self-archiving (including of preprint versions) can also be found at SHERPA/RoMEO.
Physiological Reviews provides coverage of timely issues in the physiological and biomedical sciences. Physiology publishes invited review articles written by leaders in their fields. Advances in Physiology Education promotes educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology.
for the particular submission, required under this section. Three copies of the application are required: An archival copy, a review copy, and a field copy. An application for a new chemical entity will generally contain an application form, an index, a summary, five or six
Such reviews should be more reliable and accurate and less prone to bias than a narrative review. [9] However, whereas a narrative review may give a panorama of current knowledge on a particular topic, a systematic review tends to have a narrower focus. Some journals publish third-party summaries of reviews and guidelines published elsewhere.