Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The officer did not seek a warrant to conduct the blood test, but asked McNeely for his consent. McNeely was warned by the officer that by refusing a chemical test, his license would be revoked for one year. McNeely continued to refuse, and at 2:35 a.m., the officer proceeded to instruct the lab technician to draw a specimen of blood from McNeely.
The phlebotomist was also accused of mislabeling blood to cover-up mistakes, of reusing the same pipette for both blood and urine samples and of rarely wearing rubber gloves while working. [19] [20] [21] The laboratory conducted an internal review of its phlebotomy practices at its 800 sites across the United States and found no deficiencies. [22]
A phlebotomy draw station is a place where blood is drawn from patients for laboratory testing, transfusions, donations, or research purposes. The blood is typically drawn via venipuncture or a finger stick by a healthcare professional such as a phlebotomist , nurse , or medical assistant . [ 21 ]
In medicine, venipuncture or venepuncture is the process of obtaining intravenous access for the purpose of venous blood sampling (also called phlebotomy) or intravenous therapy. In healthcare, this procedure is performed by medical laboratory scientists , medical practitioners , some EMTs , paramedics , phlebotomists , dialysis technicians ...
Missouri v. McNeely (2013) The United States Supreme Court ruled that police must generally obtain a warrant before subjecting a drunken-driving suspect to a blood test, and that the natural metabolism of blood alcohol does not establish a per se exigency that would justify a blood draw without consent. Mitchell v.
The procedure, renal denervation, was done April 25 at Millcreek Community Hospital to reduce chronically high blood pressure. Device automatically adjusts the power during nerve ablation
a warrant must have been issued ordering the taking of a blood sample, or; the patient must give his or her consent. [1] [3] [4] She cited to that effect the specific hospital policy, on which the police department had agreed, that would not permit her to provide the blood sample. [5] Payne, however, insisted he had implied consent to obtain ...
At the trial court, Mitchell made a motion to suppress the results of the hospital blood draw on the grounds that it was a warrantless search and thus unconstitutional under the Fourth Amendment. The prosecutor argued that Wisconsin's state laws constitute implied consent to blood draws once someone begins driving a vehicle. [2]