enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Insanity defense - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insanity_defense

    Over its decades of use the definition of insanity has been modified by statute, with changes to the availability of the insanity defense, what constitutes legal insanity, whether the prosecutor or defendant has the burden of proof, the standard of proof required at trial, trial procedures, and to commitment and release procedures for ...

  3. M'Naghten rules - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M'Naghten_rules

    The House of Lords delivered the following exposition of the rules: . the jurors ought to be told in all cases that every man is to be presumed to be sane, and to possess a sufficient degree of reason to be responsible for his crimes, until the contrary be proved to their satisfaction; and that to establish a defence on the ground of insanity, it must be clearly proved that, at the time of the ...

  4. United States federal laws governing defendants with mental ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_laws...

    Per Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12.2, a defendant intending to pursue an insanity defense must timely notify an attorney for the government in writing. The government then has a right to have the court order a psychiatric or psychological examination.

  5. ALI rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALI_rule

    The ALI rule, or American Law Institute Model Penal Code rule, is a recommended rule for instructing juries how to find a defendant in a criminal trial is not guilty by reason of insanity.

  6. Trump assassination attempt suspect Routh's legal team ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/trump-assassination-attempt-suspect...

    The legal team for Ryan Routh, the man accused of trying to assassinate then-presidential candidate Donald Trump at a Florida golf course in September, is considering an insanity defense.. Routh ...

  7. Durham rule - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Durham_rule

    A Durham rule, product test, or product defect rule is a rule in a criminal case by which a jury may determine a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity because a criminal act was the product of a mental disease. Examples in which such rules were articulated in common law include State v. Pike (1870) and Durham v

  8. Diminished responsibility - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminished_responsibility

    The defense is to be contrasted with insanity which is a complete but affirmative defense. In most jurisdictions a defendant would be acquitted on the grounds of insanity if the defendant established to the satisfaction of the jury that he suffered from such a mental disease or defect that he was unable to appreciate the consequences of his ...

  9. Georgia appeals court says woman who argues mental illness ...

    www.aol.com/news/georgia-appeals-court-says...

    A Georgia appeals court has ruled a woman who was suffering from a psychotic break stemming from mental illness when she caused a fatal car crash can use an insanity defense at trial. Michelle ...