enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: how to reframe should statements in essays based on scientific information

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Framing (social sciences) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Framing_(social_sciences)

    In the case of "equivalence frames", the information being presented is based on the same facts, but the "frame" in which it is presented changes, thus creating a reference-dependent perception. The effects of framing can be seen in journalism: the frame surrounding the issue can change the reader's perception without having to alter the actual ...

  3. Wikipedia:No original research - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research

    An account of a traffic incident written by a witness is a primary source of information about the event; similarly, a scientific paper documenting a new experiment conducted by the author is a primary source for the outcome of that experiment. For Wikipedia's purposes, breaking news stories are also considered to be primary sources. Historical ...

  4. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (science) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying...

    This page in a nutshell: Cite reviews, don't write them. Appropriate sources for discussing the natural sciences include comprehensive reviews in independent, reliable published sources, such as recent peer reviewed articles in reputable scientific journals, statements and reports from reputable expert bodies, widely recognized standard textbooks written by experts in a field, or standard ...

  5. Bold hypothesis - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bold_hypothesis

    In Popper's philosophy of science, scientific statements are always provisional, they have limits of application, and they could always be wrong. If a statement cannot even in principle be proved wrong, it cannot be a scientific statement. Thus, in Popper's eyes, the falsifiability criterion clearly demarcates "science" from "non-science". This ...

  6. Wikipedia : Writing better articles

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Writing_better...

    Articles start with a lead section (WP:CREATELEAD) summarising the most important points of the topic.The lead section is the first part of the article; it comes above the first header, and may contain a lead image which is representative of the topic, and/or an infobox that provides a few key facts, often statistical, such as dates and measurements.

  7. Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of...

    Rather, they should be attributed in the text to particular sources, or where justified, described as widespread views, etc. For example, an article should not state that genocide is an evil action but may state that genocide has been described by John So-and-so as the epitome of human evil. Avoid stating seriously contested assertions as facts.

  8. Thesis statement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thesis_statement

    A thesis statement is a statement of one's core argument, the main idea(s), and/or a concise summary of an essay, research paper, etc. [1] It is usually expressed in one or two sentences near the beginning of a paper, and may be reiterated elsewhere, such as in the conclusion.

  9. IMRAD - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IMRAD

    Fig.1: Wineglass model for IMRaD structure. The above scheme shows how to line up the information in IMRaD writing. It has two characteristics: the first is its top-bottom symmetric shape; the second is its change of width, meaning the top is wide, and it narrows towards the middle, and then widens again as it goes down toward the bottom.

  1. Ad

    related to: how to reframe should statements in essays based on scientific information