Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ohio v. Robinette, 519 U.S. 33 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Fourth Amendment does not require police officers to inform a motorist at the end of a traffic stop that they are free to go before seeking permission to search the motorist's car.
Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990) - search valid if police reasonably believe consent given by owner; Florida v. Bostick (1991) - not "free to leave" but "free to decline" on bus; Florida v. Jimeno (1991) - can request officer to limit scope of search; Ohio v. Robinette (1996) - do not have to inform motorist is free to go; United States v.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 519 of the United States Reports ... Ohio v. Robinette: 519 U.S. 33: 1996: United States v ...
That comes six weeks after the Ohio Supreme Court said ruling on the (The Center Square) – A bill aimed at securing state computer systems from cyber threats that now includes tightening ...
state court decisions and the application of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine: Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo: 544 U.S. 336 (2005) standard for pleading loss causation in a securities fraud claim Small v. United States: 544 U.S. 385 (2005) resolution of split appeals court decisions on inclusion of foreign courts in the term "any court ...
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Several Christmases ago I gave a family friend a copy of The Nanny Diaries, a book later adapted into a movie. Given the nature of her then line of work – as a nanny to a Manhattan family – I thought she would relate. As fate would have it, the family
In cases such as Lee v. United States, Lopez v. United States, and Hoffa v. United States, the courts have ruled that evidence found in searches based on consent obtained by an undercover officer or as an informer to be admissible. A party other than the defendant can, in some limited cases, grant consent.
The Supreme Court of the United States handed down nine per curiam opinions during its 2000 term, which began October 2, 2000 and concluded September 30, 2001. [1]Because per curiam decisions are issued from the Court as an institution, these opinions all lack the attribution of authorship or joining votes to specific justices.