enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevron_U.S.A.,_Inc._v...

    In 2002 Chevron was able to invoke Chevron deference to win another case, Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Echazabal, 536 U.S. 73 (2002), before the Supreme Court. In a unanimous decision, the Court applied Chevron deference and upheld as reasonable an Equal Employment Opportunity Commission regulation, which allowed an employer to refuse to hire an ...

  3. Opinion - The looming post-Chevron fight over the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/opinion-looming-post-chevron-fight...

    This framework — known as “Chevron deference,” because it largely grew out of the Supreme Court’s decision in Chevron v. ... To take one post-Loper Bright example, the government argued in ...

  4. What it means for the Supreme Court to throw out Chevron ...

    www.aol.com/news/means-supreme-court-throw...

    The court's 6-3 ruling on Friday overturned a 1984 decision colloquially known as Chevron that has instructed lower courts to defer to federal agencies when laws passed by Congress are not crystal ...

  5. Chevron takeaways: Supreme Court ruling removes frequently ...

    www.aol.com/news/chevron-takeaways-supreme-court...

    Federal rules that impact virtually every aspect of everyday life, from the food we eat and the cars we drive to the air we breathe, could be at risk after a wide-ranging Supreme Court ruling Friday.

  6. Auer v. Robbins - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auer_v._Robbins

    The case expands Chevron deference by giving the agency the highest deference. In Chevron, there was a two-step standard of review. The Chevron standard dealt with "a formal rationale for judicial deference to an agency's interpretation of a statute." Auer did not adopt the two-step process for review in Chevron but a single level standard of ...

  7. United States v. Haggar Apparel Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Haggar...

    The Court also ruled that the CIT must, when appropriate, give regulations Chevron deference. The Court noted that as early as 1809, Chief Justice Marshall had written in United States v. Vowell that for customs cases "if the question had been doubtful, the court would have respected the uniform construction which it is understood has been ...

  8. Why a recent Supreme Court decision could undermine the ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/why-recent-supreme-court-decision...

    The Chevron doctrine was a decadeslong legal precedent dating back to 1984 that empowered federal government agencies to interpret laws when legislation passed by Congress was ambiguous.

  9. United States v. Mead Corp. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Mead_Corp.

    United States v. Mead Corp., 533 U.S. 218 (2001), is a case decided by the United States Supreme Court that addressed the issue of when Chevron deference should be applied. In an 8–1 majority decision, the Court determined that Chevron deference applies when Congress delegated authority to the agency generally to make rules carrying the force ...