enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Morgan v. Virginia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morgan_v._Virginia

    Morgan v. Virginia, 328 U.S. 373 (1946), is a major United States Supreme Court case. In this landmark 1946 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7–1 that Virginia's state law enforcing segregation on interstate buses was unconstitutional.

  3. Sipuel v. Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sipuel_v._Board_of_Regents...

    Citing the 1938 case Missouri ex rel. Gaines v. Canada, a case in which "Lloyd Gaines, a negro, was refused admission to the School of Law of the University of Missouri". [2] The petitioners, acting on behalf of Miss Sipuel, were Thurgood Marshall of New York City, and Amos Hall, of Tulsa (also on the brief Frank D. Reeves).

  4. Taylor v. Board of Education of City School District of New ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_v._Board_of...

    Taylor v. Board of Education of City School District of New Rochelle, 195 F. Supp. 231 (S.D.N.Y. 1961), was a decision by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, which ruled that the Board of Education in New Rochelle, NY had created a segregated school system through racially discriminatory policies that confined all black children to Lincoln School, while ...

  5. History of civil rights in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_civil_rights_in...

    De jure segregation was outlawed by the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the Fair Housing Act of 1968. [12] In specific areas, however, segregation was barred earlier by the Warren Court in decisions such as the Brown v. Board of Education decision that overturned school segregation in the United States.

  6. Lopez v. Seccombe - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lopez_v._Seccombe

    Lopez v. Seccombe. 71 F. Supp. 769. 1, US District Court for the Southern District of California, 1944, was a 1944 court case within the city and county of San Bernardino about whether Mexican Americans were able to use the city's public pool at any time despite the cities restricted limits.

  7. Everything you know about Brown v. Board of Education is wrong

    www.aol.com/everything-know-brown-v-board...

    The Supreme Court eventually combined Briggs, Brown and three other segregation cases when they appeared before the court. Even though Briggs was first alphabetically, the consolidated suit was ...

  8. Delgado v. Bastrop ISD - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delgado_v._Bastrop_ISD

    Then in 1946, two years previous to the Bastrop case, the judge in Mendez v. Westminster ruled against the segregation of Mexican-American children in public schools. [6] This case occurred in California, but its arguments, based on the rights to equal protection and due process, could be applied elsewhere in the United States.

  9. Hedgepeth and Williams v. Board of Education - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedgepeth_and_Williams_v...

    Board of Education, Trenton, NJ, 131 N.J.L. 153, 35 A.2d 622 (1944), also known as the Hedgepeth–Williams case, was a landmark New Jersey Supreme Court decision decided in 1944. The Court ruled that since racial segregation was outlawed by the New Jersey State Constitution, it was unlawful for schools to segregate or refuse admission to ...