Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
In the formal speech competition genre known as policy debate, a widely accepted doctrine or "debate theory" divides the argument elements of supporting the resolution affirmative into five subtopical issues, called the stock issues. Stock issues are sometime referred to as on-case arguments or simply on-case or case arguments as opposed off ...
One traditional way to judge policy debate is to judge the Affirmative on four issues or burdens to meet, called the stock issues. The four stock issues are modeled after U.S. court procedural aspects of administrative law in deciding cases (as opposed to Constitutional controversies): ill (Harm), blame (Inherency), cure (Solvency), cost ...
In values debate, a "Significance" is a judgment about any crucial aspect of the team's debate outline, and Topicality is secondary to the Stock Issues. Significance goes toward Solvency and is weighed against Inherency, not Harms, that there is unknown danger in change (for example, from deterrence to deproliferation).
The economy, a key issue for voters as the November 5 presidential election draws nearer, will have a starring role in the debate tonight between the two candidates, Democratic nominee Kamala ...
Falls under the stock issue of inherency. Impact: an argument explaining why that condition of the status quo is damaging. Falls under the stock issue of harms. Solvency: an argument describing how the plan can alter the status quo to avoid the impact. Method 2. This method is more popular and widely used in National Public Forum Debate.
Many things affect the supply and demand of a currency (and thus its value), including inflation, interest rates, stock market performance, and government debt. Let’s dive into nine reasons why ...
Tuesday's presidential debate could also impact investor sentiment. US stocks were up on Tuesday, with investors looking to add to Monday's rebound following the big sell-off at the end of last week.
Policy debate, different from debating policy plans, is a "pure" values debate about which resolutions are best or better than the given resolution's stated policy goals. The bright-line debate between some of the adversarial groups' modern classical issues is narrow and difficult to debate for the uninitiated debate club.