enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Intentional infliction of emotional distress - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intentional_infliction_of...

    Intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED; sometimes called the tort of outrage) [1] is a common law tort that allows individuals to recover for severe emotional distress caused by another individual who intentionally or recklessly inflicted emotional distress by behaving in an "extreme and outrageous" way. [2]

  3. Negligent infliction of emotional distress - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligent_infliction_of...

    The emotional distress for which monetary damages may be recovered, however, ought not to be that form of acute emotional distress or the transient emotional reaction to the occasional gruesome or horrible incident to which every person may potentially be exposed in an industrial and sometimes violent society. . . .

  4. Dignitary tort - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dignitary_tort

    In tort law, dignitary torts involve non-physical harm, such as damage to reputation. [1] Historically, this category of torts was often covered by the writ of trespass vi et armis . Historically, the primary dignitary torts were battery , assault , and false imprisonment , as each claimed harm to a person's human dignity .

  5. United States tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_tort_law

    Although federal courts often hear tort cases arising out of common law or state statutes, there are relatively few tort claims that arise exclusively as a result of federal law. The most common federal tort claim is the 42 U.S.C. § 1983 remedy for violation of one's civil rights under color of federal or state law, which can be used to sue ...

  6. Dillon v. Legg - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dillon_v._Legg

    Dillon v. Legg, 68 Cal. 2d 728 (1968), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that established the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress.To date, it is the most persuasive decision of the most persuasive state supreme court in the United States during the latter half of the 20th century: Dillon has been favorably cited and followed by at least twenty reported out-of ...

  7. Thing v. La Chusa - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thing_v._La_Chusa

    La Chusa, 48 Cal. 3d 644 (1989), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of California that limited the scope of the tort of negligent infliction of emotional distress. The majority opinion was authored by Associate Justice David Eagleson , and it is regarded as his single most famous opinion and representative of his conservative judicial ...

  8. Negligence in employment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Negligence_in_employment

    Negligence in employment encompasses several causes of action in tort law that arise where an employer is held liable for the tortious acts of an employee because that employer was negligent in providing the employee with the ability to engage in a particular act.

  9. Outline of tort law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_tort_law

    The following outline is provided as an overview of and introduction to tort law in common law jurisdictions: Tort law – defines what a legal injury is and, therefore, whether a person may be held liable for an injury they have caused. Legal injuries are not limited to physical injuries. They may also include emotional, economic, or ...