Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
It works on Linux, Windows, macOS, and is available in Python, [8] R, [9] and models built using CatBoost can be used for predictions in C++, Java, [10] C#, Rust, Core ML, ONNX, and PMML. The source code is licensed under Apache License and available on GitHub. [6] InfoWorld magazine awarded the library "The best machine learning tools" in 2017.
A dynamic programming algorithm for the prediction of a restricted class (H-type and kissing hairpins) of RNA pseudoknots. Yes: sourcecode, webserver Archived 2014-05-14 at the Wayback Machine [18] Pknots: A dynamic programming algorithm for optimal RNA pseudoknot prediction using the nearest neighbour energy model. Yes: sourcecode [19] PknotsRG
Soon after, the Python and R packages were built, and XGBoost now has package implementations for Java, Scala, Julia, Perl, and other languages. This brought the library to more developers and contributed to its popularity among the Kaggle community, where it has been used for a large number of competitions.
DECIPHER is a web-based resource and database of genomic variation data from analysis of patient DNA. [ 1 ] [ 2 ] [ 3 ] It documents submicroscopic chromosome abnormalities ( microdeletions and duplications ) and pathogenic sequence variants (single nucleotide variants - SNVs, Insertions, Deletions, InDels), from over 25000 patients and maps ...
DECIPHER is a software that can be used to decipher and manage biological sequences efficiently using the programming language R. Features ...
The Smith-Waterman algorithm was an extension of a previous optimal method, the Needleman–Wunsch algorithm, which was the first sequence alignment algorithm that was guaranteed to find the best possible alignment. However, the time and space requirements of these optimal algorithms far exceed the requirements of BLAST.
Tournament selection has several benefits over alternative selection methods for genetic algorithms (for example, fitness proportionate selection and reward-based selection): it is efficient to code, works on parallel architectures and allows the selection pressure to be easily adjusted. [2]
These algorithms typically do not work well for larger read sets, as they do not easily reach a global optimum in the assembly, and do not perform well on read sets that contain repeat regions. [1] Early de novo sequence assemblers, such as SEQAID [ 2 ] (1984) and CAP [ 3 ] (1992), used greedy algorithms, such as overlap-layout-consensus (OLC ...