enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Pawnless chess endgame - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pawnless_chess_endgame

    A pawnless chess endgame is a chess endgame in which only a few pieces remain, and no pawns.The basic checkmates are types of pawnless endgames. Endgames without pawns do not occur very often in practice except for the basic checkmates of king and queen versus king, king and rook versus king, and queen versus rook. [1]

  3. Rook and bishop versus rook endgame - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_and_bishop_versus...

    The rook and bishop versus rook endgame is a chess endgame where one player has just a king, a rook, and a bishop, and the other player has just a king and a rook.This combination of material is one of the most common pawnless chess endgames.

  4. Chess endgame - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_endgame

    A rook versus a minor piece: normally a draw but in some cases the rook wins, see pawnless chess endgame. A rook versus a minor piece and one pawn: usually a draw but the rook may win. A rook versus a minor piece and two pawns: usually a draw but the minor piece may win. A rook versus a minor piece and three pawns: a win for the minor piece.

  5. Rook and pawn versus rook endgame - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rook_and_pawn_versus_rook...

    In a few cases, the superior side gives up their rook in order to promote the pawn, resulting in a winning queen versus rook position (see Pawnless chess endgame § Queen versus rook). A rule of thumb (with exceptions) is: if the king on the side without the pawn can reach the queening square of the pawn, the game is a draw ; otherwise it is a ...

  6. Chess endgame literature - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chess_endgame_literature

    Horowitz and Kling's analysis of the endgame of two bishops versus a knight had been questioned, and was eventually overturned by computer databases (see pawnless chess endgame). [14] In 1864 Alfred Crosskill published analysis of the endgame of rook and bishop versus rook, an endgame that has been studied at least as far back as Philidor in 1749.

  7. Wrong bishop - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrong_bishop

    In a chess endgame, a wrong bishop is a bishop that would have been better placed on the opposite square color. [1] This most commonly occurs with a bishop and one of its rook pawns, but it also occurs with a rook versus a bishop, a rook and one rook pawn versus a bishop, and possibly with a rook and one bishop pawn versus a bishop.

  8. The exchange (chess) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_exchange_(chess)

    In an endgame without pawns, the advantage of the exchange is normally not enough to win (see pawnless chess endgame). The most common exceptions when there are no pawns are (1) a rook versus a bishop in which the defending king is trapped in a corner of the same color as his bishop, (2) a knight separated from its king that may be cornered and ...

  9. Category:Chess endgames - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Chess_endgames

    Pawnless chess endgame; Philidor position; Q. ... Rook and bishop versus rook endgame; Rook and pawn versus rook endgame; S. Saavedra position; T. Tarrasch rule ...