enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Godfrey of Brabant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_of_Brabant

    After the death of his brother, he supported his nephew John II of Brabant against all internal and external opposition. In 1302, when Flanders revolted against King Philip IV of France, Godfrey and his only son joined the army of his French ally in the Battle of the Golden Spurs. Both were killed, as were many more knights of Brabant.

  3. John I, Duke of Brabant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_I,_Duke_of_Brabant

    John I, also called John the Victorious (1252/53 – 3 May 1294) was Duke of Brabant (1267–1294), Lothier and Limburg (1288–1294). During the 13th century, John I was venerated as a folk hero. [1] He has been painted as the perfect model of a brave, adventurous and chivalrous feudal prince. [2]

  4. Summary judgment - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Summary_judgment

    The court must consider all designated evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the summary judgment motion. If a trial could result in the jury (or judge in a bench trial) deciding in favor of the party opposing the motion, then summary judgment is inappropriate. A decision granting summary judgment can be appealed without delay.

  5. Godfrey I, Count of Louvain - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_I,_Count_of_Louvain

    Godfrey I (Dutch: Godfried, c. 1060 – 25 January 1139), called the Bearded, the Courageous, or the Great, was the Landgrave of Brabant, Count of Brussels and Leuven (Louvain) from 1095 to his death and Duke of Lower Lorraine from 1106 to 1129. He was also Margrave of Antwerp from 1106 to his death.

  6. List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_States...

    Maine v. Taylor: 477 U.S. 131 (1986) Exception to Dormant Commerce Clause: Anderson v. Liberty Lobby: 477 U.S. 242 (1986) Standard for summary judgment: Celotex Corp. v. Catrett: 477 U.S. 317 (1986) Standard for summary judgment Ford v. Wainwright: 477 U.S. 399 (1986) Competence to be executed Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court: 478 U.S. 1 ...

  7. Duke of Brabant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duke_of_Brabant

    Coat of arms of the Duchy of Brabant.. The Duke of Brabant (Dutch: hertog van Brabant, French: duc de Brabant) was the ruler of the Duchy of Brabant since 1183/1184. The title was created by the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick Barbarossa in favor of Henry I of the House of Reginar, son of Godfrey III of Leuven (who was duke of Lower Lorraine at that time).

  8. Duchy of Brabant - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duchy_of_Brabant

    About one hundred years later, in 1183/1184, Emperor Frederick I Barbarossa formally established the Duchy of Brabant and created the hereditary title of duke of Brabant in favour of Henry I of Brabant, son of Count Godfrey III of Leuven. Although the original county was still quite small - and limited to the territory between the Dender and ...

  9. Williams v. Taylor (Michael Williams) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Williams_v._Taylor...

    Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 420 (2000), was a United States Supreme Court case concerning the interpretation of a provision of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA). The case was argued on February 28, 2000, and decided on April 18, 2000.