enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Miranda warning - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_warning

    You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to talk to a lawyer for advice before we ask you any questions. You have the right to have a lawyer with you during questioning. If you cannot afford a lawyer, one will be appointed for you before any questioning if you wish.

  3. Right to silence - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence

    You have the right to remain silent, but anything you do say will be taken down and may be used in evidence. was used. Major reform to the questioning and treatment of suspected offenders occurred in 1984 when the Police and Criminal Evidence Act came into force.

  4. Right to silence in England and Wales - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in...

    Anything you do say may be given in evidence. In some circumstances, particularly if a suspect has requested legal advice but has not been allowed the opportunity to consult a solicitor, no adverse inferences may be drawn. [5] In this scenario, the appropriate caution is amended to omit this possibility: You do not have to say anything, but ...

  5. Ernesto Miranda - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ernesto_Miranda

    The Supreme Court did not mandate a specific wording. [5] A generic admonition might look like this: You have the right to remain silent. If you give up the right to remain silent, anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney and to have an attorney present during questioning.

  6. Miranda v. Arizona - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miranda_v._Arizona

    Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that law enforcement in the United States must warn a person of their constitutional rights before interrogating them, or else the person's statements cannot be used as evidence at their trial.

  7. Salinas v. Texas - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salinas_v._Texas

    Salinas v. Texas, 570 US 178 (2013), is a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, which the court held 5-4 decision, declaring that the Fifth Amendment's self-incrimination clause does not extend to defendants who simply choose to remain silent during questioning, even though no arrest has been made nor the Miranda rights read to a defendant.

  8. Truth behind the Donald Trump quote from 1998 that's rapidly ...

    www.aol.com/news/2016-11-09-truth-behind-the...

    He continued, saying that they'd believe anything Fox broadcasts. Trump's alleged words began circulating the online sphere in October 2015 , when Trump's campaign was beginning to be taken seriously.

  9. Right to silence in Australia - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_silence_in_Australia

    Before I ask you any questions I must tell you that you have the right to remain silent. This means you do not have to say anything, answer any question or make any statement unless you wish to do so. However, if you do say something or make a statement, it may later be used as evidence. Do you understand? [15]