enow.com Web Search

  1. Ad

    related to: california case net litigant search
  2. courtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Writ of mandate (California) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Writ_of_mandate_(California)

    In those cases, the writ is no longer discretionary and the Court of Appeal must issue a full decision on the issue. [31] For example, a writ petition is the only way for a denial of a Public Records Act lawsuit to be appealed; [ 32 ] as such, the petition must be considered in its whole.

  3. California superior courts - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Superior_Courts

    One quirk of California law is that when a party petitions the appellate courts for a writ of mandate (California's version of mandamus), the case name becomes [petitioner name] v. Superior Court (that is, the superior court is the respondent on appeal), and the real opponent is then listed below those names as the " real party in interest ".

  4. California Court Case Management System - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Court_Case...

    Five Superior Courts—in Orange, Sacramento, San Diego, San Joaquin, and Ventura Counties—use CCMS version 3 to process civil cases. This represents approximately 25 percent of the civil case volume in California. [3] Fresno is the only Superior Court still using version 2 of CCMS.

  5. California Courts of Appeal - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Courts_of_Appeal

    All California appellate courts are required by the California Constitution to decide criminal cases in writing with reasons stated (meaning that even in criminal appeals where the defendant's own lawyer has tacitly conceded that the appeal has no merit, [6] the appellate decision must summarize the facts and law of the case and review possible ...

  6. Plata v. Schwarzenegger - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plata_v._Schwarzenegger

    Plata v. Newsom, Docket No. 4:01-cv-01351-JST (), is a federal class action civil rights lawsuit alleging that the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation's (CDCR) medical services are inadequate and violate the Eighth Amendment, the Americans with Disabilities Act, and section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.

  7. Menendez brothers clemency decision delayed until new DA can ...

    www.aol.com/news/menendez-brothers-clemency...

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom says a clemency decision for convicted murderers Erik and Lyle Menendez is on hold until Los Angeles' newly-elected district attorney can review the case.

  8. Hollingsworth v. Perry - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hollingsworth_v._Perry

    Hollingsworth v. Perry was a series of United States federal court cases that re-legalized same-sex marriage in the state of California. The case began in 2009 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, which found that banning same-sex marriage violates equal protection under the law.

  9. Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamex_Operations_West...

    Dynamex Operations W. v. Superior Court and Charles Lee, Real Party in Interest, 4 Cal.5th 903 (Cal. 2018) was a landmark case handed down by the California Supreme Court on April 30, 2018. A class of drivers for a same-day delivery company, Dynamex, claimed that they were misclassified as independent contractors and thus unlawfully deprived of ...

  1. Ad

    related to: california case net litigant search