enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. List of New Testament verses not included in modern English ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_New_Testament...

    The sentiment was articulated (but not originated) by what Rev. Samuel T. Bloomfield wrote in 1832: "Surely, nothing dubious ought to be admitted into 'the sure word' of 'The Book of Life'." [11] The King James Only movement, which believes that only the King James Version (KJV) of the Bible (1611) in English is the true word of God, has ...

  3. An Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Historical_Account_of...

    The shorter portion of Newton's dissertation was concerned with 1 Timothy 3:16, which reads (in the King James Version): . And without controversy great is the mystery of godliness: God was manifest in the flesh, justified in the Spirit, seen of angels, preached unto the Gentiles, believed on in the world, received up into glory.

  4. Bible errata - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_errata

    "Judas Bible", from 1613: This Bible has Judas, not Jesus, saying "Sit ye here while I go yonder and pray" (Matthew 26:36). [11] [12] A second folio edition printed by Robert Barker, printer to King James I, is held in St. Mary's Church, Totnes, Devon. In this copy, the misprint has been covered with a small slip of paper glued over the name of ...

  5. King James Only movement - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King_James_Only_movement

    The exclusive use of the King James Version is recorded in a statement made by the Tennessee Association of Baptists in 1817, stating "We believe that any person, either in a public or private capacity who would adhere to, or propagate any alteration of the New Testament contrary to that already translated by order of King James the 1st, that is now in common in use, ought not to be encouraged ...

  6. Criticism of the Bible - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_the_Bible

    Specific collections of biblical writings, such as the Hebrew Bible and Christian Bibles, are considered sacred and authoritative by their respective faith groups. [11] The limits of the canon were effectively set by the proto-orthodox churches from the 1st throughout the 4th century; however, the status of the scriptures has been a topic of scholarly discussion in the later churches.

  7. Bible version debate - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bible_version_debate

    The Geneva Bible (1557) became the "Bible of the Puritans" and made an enormous impression on English Bible translation, second only to Tyndale. Part of this was due to its issue as a small book, an octavo size; part due to the extensive commentary; and part due to the work and endorsement of John Calvin and Theodore Beza , two of the most ...

  8. Opinion: What these states get wrong about the Bible and the ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-public-schools-not-sunday...

    Bible study is neither helpful nor necessary for students to understand constitutional law or civics because our laws are secular and not based on the Ten Commandments (or any other religious text).

  9. Napoleon and the Jews - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_and_the_Jews

    Napoleon hoped to use equality as a way of gaining advantage from discriminated groups, like Jews or Protestants. Both aspects of his thinking can be seen in an 1818 response to physician Barry O'Meara, his physician during his exile on St. Helena, asking why he pressed for the emancipation of the Jews: