enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Marsh v. Alabama - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsh_v._Alabama

    Marsh v. Alabama, 326 U.S. 501 (1946), was a case decided by the US Supreme Court, which ruled that a state trespassing statute could not be used to prevent the distribution of religious materials on a town's sidewalk even though the sidewalk was part of a privately-owned company town.

  3. Kent v. Dulles - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_v._Dulles

    The cases were heard on writ of certiorari. [5] The Court reversed the Court of Appeals. Kent v. Dulles was the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the right to travel is a part of the "liberty" of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment. It did not decide the extent to which ...

  4. Shurtleff v. City of Boston - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shurtleff_v._City_of_Boston

    The case concerned the City of Boston's program that allowed groups to have their flags flown outside Boston City Hall. In a unanimous 9–0 decision, the Court ruled that the city violated a Christian group's free speech rights when it denied their request to raise a Christian flag over City Hall.

  5. Kennedy v. Bremerton School District - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy_v._Bremerton...

    Kennedy v. Bremerton School District, 597 U.S. 507 (2022), is a landmark decision [1] by the United States Supreme Court in which the Court held, 6–3, that the government, while following the Establishment Clause, may not suppress an individual from engaging in personal religious observance, as doing so would violate the Free Speech and Free Exercise Clauses of the First Amendment.

  6. Stromberg v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stromberg_v._California

    Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359 (1931), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court held, 7–2, that a California statute banning red flags was unconstitutional because it violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. [1]

  7. Requiring ugly images of smoking's harm on cigarettes won't ...

    www.aol.com/news/requiring-ugly-images-smokings...

    It sent the case back to the district court to consider that issue. The images in question include a picture of a woman with a large growth on her neck and the caption “WARNING: Smoking causes ...

  8. Cantwell v. Connecticut - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantwell_v._Connecticut

    Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940), is a landmark court decision [1] [2] by the United States Supreme Court holding that the First Amendment's federal protection of religious free exercise incorporates via the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and so applies to state governments too.

  9. Supreme Court 'swipe fees' ruling may open US regulations to ...

    www.aol.com/news/supreme-court-swipe-fees-ruling...

    Swipe fees, also called interchange fees, reimburse banks for costs involved in offering debit cards. The fees are determined by Visa, MasterCard and other card networks, with a cap of 21 cents ...