Ads
related to: murdock vs pennsylvania court case search by case numbercourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
- Public Court Records
See Public Public Court Records
Millions Of Citizens. Search Today!
- Court Case Records
Get Info On Any Public Court Case
Reveal Incriminating Details Today!
- Court Criminal Check
Court Records, Millions Of Citizens
Available In Our Database. Search
- State Court Record Search
Search Our Database For Court Info
Answer Your Burning Questions Now!
- Public Court Records
infotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Murdock v. Pennsylvania , 319 U.S. 105 (1943), was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that an ordinance requiring door-to-door salespersons ("solicitors") to purchase a license was an unconstitutional tax on religious exercise.
Overruling Jones v. City of Opelika I on rehearing Murdock v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania: 319 U.S. 105 (1943) licensing fee for door-to-door solicitors was an unconstitutional tax on the Jehovah's Witnesses' right to freely exercise their religion—decided same day as Jones v. City of Opelika II: Martin v. Struthers: 319 U.S. 141 (1943)
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ...
Case name Citation Date decided L.T. Barringer and Company v. United States: 319 U.S. 1: 1943: Roche v. Evaporated Milk Association: 319 U.S. 21: 1943: Bowles v.
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Held that state taxpayers do not have standing to challenge to state tax laws in federal court. 9–0 Massachusetts v. EPA: 2007: States have standing to sue the EPA to enforce their views of federal law, in this case, the view that carbon dioxide was an air pollutant under the Clean Air Act. Cited Georgia v. Tennessee Copper Co. as precedent.
The court, in a brief order, dismissed three appeals in the case, vacated a lower court order and said the subpoena became “unenforceable” when the state Legislature's two-year session ended ...
One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania: 792 Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting: 793 Winston v. Lee: 794 Henderson v. United States (2013) 795 Maryland v. Garrison: 796 Lee v. Washington: 797 Cedar Rapids Community School Dist. v. Garret F. 798 NLRB v. Kentucky River Community Care, Inc. 799 S. D. Warren Co. v. Maine Board of Environmental ...
Ads
related to: murdock vs pennsylvania court case search by case numbercourtrec.com has been visited by 100K+ users in the past month
infotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month