Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Bryan v. McPherson, 630 F.3d 805 (9th Cir. 2009), was heard by United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in October 2009. Plaintiff-appellee Carl Bryan was tasered by defendant-appellant Officer Brian MacPherson after being pulled over to the side of the road for failure to wear a seat belt.
Wardlaw wrote the majority opinion in Bryan v. MacPherson , a case where police officers tasered a man at a traffic spot because he was not wearing a seatbelt. Wardlaw concluded that the police violated the man's 4th amendment rights, and that use of a taser can be considered excessive force .
It was the first Supreme Court case to consider whether certain methods of states' appointments of their electors were constitutional. [2] The Court, in a majority opinion authored by Chief Justice Melville Fuller, [3] upheld Michigan's law, and more generally gave state legislatures plenary power over how they appointed their electors.
Bryan Sparks, 42, was indicted for the fraud scheme in November 2021 and pleaded guilty to wire fraud and aggravated identity theft in January. He was also ordered on Tuesday to pay more than $1 ...
McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), was a United States Supreme Court case decided on October 17, 1892. [2] The case concerned a law passed in Michigan which divided the state into separate congressional districts and awarded one of the state's electoral votes to the winner of each district.
Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987), is a major decision of the Supreme Court of the United States concerning the First Amendment, specifically whether the protection of the First Amendment extends to government employees who make extremely critical remarks about the President. The Court ruled that, while direct threats on the President's ...
Trinity — 27 state titles (the most among all schools) in 31 finals appearances, the last coming in 2020. Quick hits. Class 6A offense ranks: No. 2 Bryan Station (35.5 ppg); No. 7 Trinity (32.6 ...
MacPherson v. Buick Motor Co. , 217 N.Y. 382, 111 N.E. 1050 (1916) is a famous New York Court of Appeals opinion by Judge Benjamin N. Cardozo that removed the requirement of privity of contract for duty in negligence actions.