Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Please do not delete or flag potential "spoilers" in Wikipedia articles. It is generally expected that the subjects of Wikipedia articles will be covered in detail, and giving a section a title such as "Plot" or "Ending" is considered sufficient warning to the reader that the text will contain revelations about the narrative.
Discord: chat messages [45] Discourse uses the CommonMark flavor of Markdown in the forum post composer. Doxygen: a source code documentation generator which supports Markdown with extra features [46] GitHub Flavored Markdown (GFM) ignores underscores in words, and adds syntax highlighting, task lists, [47] and tables [31]
Wikipedia articles may include spoilers and no spoiler warnings. A spoiler is a piece of information about a narrative work (such as a book, film, television series, or a video game) that reveals plot points or twists. Articles on the Internet sometimes feature a spoiler warning to alert readers to spoilers in the text, which they may then ...
And yet the guideline states "A spoiler is a piece of information about a narrative work (such as a book, film, television series, or a video game) which reveals plot points or twists and thus may degrade the experience of persons who wish to experience the work themselves." and "When including spoilers, editors should make sure that an ...
Plenty of encyclopedic content about fictional works is spoiler-free. One also has to beg the question of why people would be looking at the story and character sections of an article they don't want to read spoilers for. Such sections don't necessarily contain spoilers throughout. Excluding spoilers would be emaciating the encyclopedia, I'm ...
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
I would say let the individual users of the articles decide whether the spoiler warning is necessary and in the right place, rather than create a universal format that then ruins the usefulness of the availability of knowledge that a free encyclopedia provides (e.g. perhaps those knowledgable in video games feel it is more necessary than those ...
That leaves me wondering whether to a) leave the article alone, b) move the end spoiler to follow the second paragraph of "Religious Content," or c) remove the spoiler tags, on the grounds that the only real plot ending detail is who Meg rescues and how, and that's in the plot section and can be avoided by spoiler info-averse readers on general ...