Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47 (2006), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that the federal government, under the Solomon Amendment, could constitutionally withhold funding from universities if they refuse to give military recruiters access to school resources.
Case name Citation Date decided Texaco Inc. v. Dagher: 547 U.S. 1: 2006: Scheidler v. National Organization for Women: 547 U.S. 9: 2006: Ill. Tool Works Inc. v ...
Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc. 547 U.S. 47 (2006) First Amendment • conditions on government funding • compelled speech • Homosexuality in the U.S. military • Solomon Amendment: Unanimous
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights
Varian v. Delfino - Amicus curiae for Michelangelo Delfino and Mary Day; Gonzales v. Oregon - Amicus curiae for Oregon; Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights - Amicus curiae for Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights; MGM v. Grokster - Amicus curiae in support of Grokster; 2006 Qassim v. Bush - Amicus curiae in support of ...
The Supreme Court, in Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc. (2006), unanimously held that the federal government could constitutionally withhold funding from universities, no matter what their nondiscrimination policies might be, for refusing to give military recruiters access to school resources. An association of law ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us
Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights v. Rumsfeld, 390 F.3d 219 (3d Cir. 2004): FAIR, an association of law schools and law faculty, challenged the Solomon Amendment, which requires the Department of Defense to deny federal funding to institutions of higher education that bar military recruiters. The schools argued that forcing them to ...