Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The possibility of reverter can only follow a fee simple determinable. Example: "O grants Blackacre to A as long as A refrains from drinking alcohol." Analysis: If A never drinks after the grant (and never sells the property), then Blackacre will belong to A at O's death, and be distributed according to the rules of probate .
The rule against perpetuities serves a number of purposes. First, English courts have long recognized that allowing owners to attach long-lasting contingencies to their property harms the ability of future generations to freely buy and sell the property, since few people would be willing to buy property that had unresolved issues regarding its ownership hanging over it.
A reversion in property law is a future interest that is retained by the grantor after the conveyance of an estate of a lesser quantum than he has ...
But to fully prevent the possibility, you would need to use your usual contraception methods, says Babayev, or simply avoid having intercourse after your pregnancy is confirmed, notes Beckley.
The interest will revert to the grantor or the heirs of the grantor. Normally, a possibility of reverter follows a fee simple determinable. However, a possibility of reverter does not follow a fee simple determinable subject to an executory interest, because a possibility of reverter is in the grantor while an executory interest is in a third ...
In property law of the United Kingdom and the United States and other common law countries, a remainder is a future interest given to a person (who is referred to as the transferee or remainderman) that is capable of becoming possessory upon the natural end of a prior estate created by the same instrument. [1]
Hormonal contraceptives have a possible effect of preventing implantation of a blastocyst, as discussed previously. Use of these drugs with the intention of preventing pregnancy is seen by some anti-abortion groups as immoral. This is because of the possibility of causing the end of a new human life. [50]
Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), [1] was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that the Constitution of the United States protected the right to have an abortion prior to the point of fetal viability.