enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murphy_v._National...

    Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, No. 16-476, 584 U.S. 453 (2018) [138 S. Ct. 1461], was a United States Supreme Court case involving the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The issue was whether the U.S. federal government has the right to control state lawmaking.

  3. California Senate Bill 54 (2017) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/California_Senate_Bill_54...

    2017 California Senate Bill 54, commonly referred to as "SB 54" and also known as the "California Values Act" is a 2017 California state law that prevents state and local law enforcement agencies from using their resources on behalf of federal immigration enforcement agencies. [1] The law allows for cooperation between local, state and federal ...

  4. Import-Export Clause - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Import-Export_Clause

    Maryland, wrote the Supreme Court's opinion in Almy v. California, which found a tax on a bill of lading for gold dust exported from California to New York violated the Import Export Clause. [18] "We think this case cannot be distinguished from that of Brown v.

  5. People can't be detained just for trying to avoid police ...

    www.aol.com/news/people-cant-detained-just...

    Police officers cannot detain someone on the street just because that person acts furtively to avoid contact with them, the California Supreme Court ruled Thursday.

  6. Lange v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lange_v._California

    Lange v. California, 594 U.S. ___ (2021), was a United States Supreme Court case involving the exigent circumstances requirement related to the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution. The Court ruled unanimously that the warrantless entry into a home by police in pursuit of a misdemeanant is not unequivocally justified.

  7. Brendlin v. California - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brendlin_v._California

    Motion to suppress denied; reversed, California Court of Appeal; reversed, 136 P.3d 845 (Cal. 2006); cert. granted, 549 U.S. 1177 (2007). Holding; Automobile passengers are "seized" within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when the car in which they are riding is held at a law enforcement traffic stop. California Supreme Court vacated and ...

  8. California companies wrote their own gig worker law, but ...

    www.aol.com/california-companies-wrote-own-gig...

    After Prop. 22 passed, opponents challenged it and the case ended up before the California Supreme Court, which upheld the law in July, effectively affirming that drivers are independent ...

  9. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ... - AOL

    www.aol.com/news/controversial-labor-law-doesnt...

    The California Supreme Court ruling curtails the ability of public employees in the state to seek help from the courts in labor disputes. Public employees cannot use labor law to sue employers ...