Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Rajaram I (Rajaram Bhonsale, Marathi pronunciation: [[ɾaːd͡ʒaɾaːm ˈbʱos(ə)le]; 24 February 1670 – 3 March 1700) [2] was the third Chhatrapati of the Maratha Kingdom, who ruled from 1689 to his death in 1700.
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Donate
Rajaram II of Satara, putative grandson of Rajaram Chhatrapati, ruled 1749–1777; Rajaram II (1850–1870), Raja of Kolhapur 1866–1870; Rajaram III (1897–1940), Maharaja of Kolhapur 1922–1940; Raja Ram Dayal Singh, Indian monarch; Rajaram Dattatraya Thakur (1923–1975), Indian film director; Rajaram Amrut Bhalerao (1933–2020), Indian ...
During these critical days of the Maratha kingdom under Rajaram it was Pralhad Niraji, who came to the front and exercised considerable influence in Maratha politics. But the most influential man at that time was Ramchandra Pant Amatya , whose father Abbaji Sondev had been Shivaji's military commander.
Tarabai married Rajaram at the age of 8 in 1682, becoming his second wife. After the death of his half-brother and predecessor Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj , Rajaram ruled the Maratha Kingdom from 1689 to 1700, when his first wife Jankibai was the queen consort.
The siege of Jinji, (September 1690–8 January 1698), began when the Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb appointed Zulfiqar Ali Khan as the Nawab of the Carnatic and dispatched him to besiege and capture Jinji Fort, which had been sacked and captured by Maratha Empire troops led by Rajaram, they had also ambushed and killed about 300 Mughal Sowars in the Carnatic.
This file contains additional information, probably added from the digital camera or scanner used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details may not fully reflect the modified file.
Rajaram extensively published on topics related to ancient Indian history and Indian archaeology, alleging a Eurocentric bias in Indology and Sanskrit scholarship. [9] He advocated the Indigenous Aryans hypothesis and rejected Indo-Aryan migration theory as a fabricated version of history devised for missionary and colonial interests, and later propounded by left-liberals and Marxists.