Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Starmer began the speech by claiming that "the previous Government were running an open borders experiment." [9] He then stated that the Conservative Party had promised to reduce immigration levels into the UK, but failed and failed so on purpose, saying that "Brexit was used for that purpose to turn Britain into a one-nation experiment in open borders.
The government argued that the existing visa options are sufficient for international students in Scotland, and noted that, "Applying different immigration rules to different parts of the UK would complicate the immigration system, harming its integrity, and cause difficulties for employers with a presence in more than one part of the UK." [39]
United Kingdom immigration law is the law that relates to who may enter, work in and remain in the United Kingdom.There are many reasons as to why people may migrate; the three main reasons being seeking asylum, because their home countries have become dangerous [citation needed], people migrating for economic reasons and people migrating to be reunited with family members.
The Immigration Act 1971, section 1, provides for "rules laid down by the Secretary of State as to the practice to be followed in the administration of this Act". [9] By August 2018, the Immigration Rules stood at almost 375,000 words, often so precise and detailed that the services of a lawyer are typically required to navigate them.
The "Go Home" vans were part of a controversial 2013 advertising campaign by the British Home Office during Theresa May's tenure as Home Secretary in which advertising vans with slogans recommending that illegal immigrants should "go home or face arrest" were sent to tour areas with high immigrant populations.
The going concern assumption is a fundamental assumption in the preparation of financial statements. Under the going concern assumption, an entity is ordinarily viewed as continuing in business for the foreseeable future with neither the intention nor the necessity of liquidation, ceasing trading or seeking protection from creditors pursuant to ...
On 5 July 2023, the government confirmed that they would go ahead with the bill, despite defeat in the House of Lords. [10] On 11 July 2023, Immigration Minister Robert Jenrick confirmed the government did not support what he described as “little short of wrecking amendments” to the bill. [11] On 20 July 2023, the bill received royal assent.
The Upper Tribunal of the Asylum and Immigration Tribunal, comprising immigration judges Mr Haddon-Cave J and Mr Kopieczek have since ruled that the Surinder Singh principles apply to unmarried partners (and by analogy, other members of a British returning worker's "extended family"): Kamila Santos Campelo Cain v Secretary of State for the Home ...