enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Bar_Association...

    2.1: Attorney's role as a candid advisor on topics within and outside of the law. [15] 3 Advocate 3.3: Duty of Candor in communications with a court. [16] 3.4: Responsibility for cooperation and fair dealing with other parties and attorneys. [17] 3.8: Special Responsibilities of a Prosecutor. [18] 4 Transactions with Persons Other Than Clients

  3. Kompetenz-kompetenz - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kompetenz-Kompetenz

    The doctrine of kompetenz-kompetenz is enshrined in the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and Arbitration Rules. [4] [5] Article 16(1) of the Model Law and article 23(1) of the Arbitration Rules both dictate that "[t]he arbitral tribunal shall have the power to rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the ...

  4. Rules of Decision Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rules_of_Decision_Act

    Tyson (1842) originally read this Act of Congress as limited to state statutory law, but later overturned Swift in Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938) and instead held that the Rules of Decision Act requires the application of state law including case law originating from state courts. The Act originated as Section 34 of the Judiciary Act of ...

  5. Judicial review in English law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Judicial_review_in_English_law

    The most common order made in successful judicial review proceedings is a quashing order. If the court makes a quashing order it can send the case back to the original decision maker directing it to remake the decision in light of the court’s findings. Very rarely, if there is no purpose in sending the case back, it may take the decision itself.

  6. Inequitable conduct - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inequitable_conduct

    However, a subsequent CAFC decision seems to directly contradict the standard used in McKesson. In the 2009 case Exergen Corp. v. Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and S.A.A.T. Systems , [ 10 ] SAAT attempted to defend with a claim of inequitable conduct, alleging Exergen was aware of two earlier patents that it did not cite to the examiner during prosecution.

  7. Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tribunals,_Courts_and...

    The first chambers within the First-tier Tribunal were planned to start sitting on 3 November 2008. [8] The act replaces the Council on Tribunals with an Administrative Justice and Tribunals Council and creates the office of Senior President of Tribunals, to be appointed by the Queen on the recommendation of the Lord Chancellor. (s.2/ Sch.1). [13]

  8. Federal tribunals in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_tribunals_in_the...

    Article III courts (also called Article III tribunals) are the U.S. Supreme Court and the inferior courts of the United States established by Congress, which currently are the 13 United States courts of appeals, the 91 United States district courts (including the districts of D.C. and Puerto Rico, but excluding the territorial district courts of the Northern Mariana Islands, Guam, and the ...

  9. Adversarial system - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adversarial_system

    The adversarial system or adversary system or accusatorial system [1] or accusatory system [2] is a legal system used in the common law countries where two advocates represent their parties' case or position before an impartial person or group of people, usually a judge or jury, who attempt to determine the truth and pass judgment accordingly.