Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Research shows that Wikipedia is prone to neutrality violations caused by bias from its editors, including systemic bias. [6] [7] A comprehensive study conducted on ten different versions of Wikipedia revealed that disputes among editors predominantly arise on the subject of politics, encompassing politicians, political parties, political movements, and ideologies.
Arguments like "reality has a liberal bias" or "information, knowledge, and education are a liberalizing influence", two statements with which I generally agree, don't engage with the question of left-of-liberal influence and ideology on academia, replete with its postmodern undermining of objectivity and the scientific method and its neo ...
The Telegraph cites Bayer's article, and much of the rest of the article quotes British conservatives on why they think that Wikipedia has a liberal bias. Toby Young says: "My own Wikipedia entry looks like it’s been written by [Left-wing commentator] Owen Jones," says Toby Young, the director of the Free Speech Union. "I used to check it ...
This is an accepted version of this page This is the latest accepted revision, reviewed on 26 February 2025. There is 1 pending revision awaiting review. Province of Thailand Province in Thailand Loei เลย Province Flag Seal Motto(s): City of the sea of mountains, coldest place in Siam, with beautiful flowers of three seasons Map of Thailand highlighting Loei province Coordinates: 17°29 ...
Not least in articles about Why Wikipedia is not so great which by no means reflect all the Wikipedia:Criticisms that qualified people have levied on it. Similarly, fanatical or ignorant users adhering to generally good rules to Wikipedia:avoid self-references and Wikipedia:Redirects have failed to recognize the few places where these are in ...
Typical headlines were "Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger blasts site for left-wing bias: 'The word for it is propaganda'" , and "Nobody should trust Wikipedia, says man who invented Wikipedia – He says there’s a complex game being played to make an article say what somebody wants it to say", from The Independent.
In a 2015 discussion, users debated between an image of Trump staring at the camera (left) and an image of Trump smiling at a CPAC event (center). Editors ultimately chose an alternative image: Trump "listening and expressionless" (right). Wikipedia coverage of Donald Trump has been a subject of controversy, largely on the English-language version, since 2015 after he launched his 2016 United ...
To answer this question, some great people have written some explanations and arguments on this page. Everybody should use Wikipedia, either as a source or, if you find deficiencies, as a medium you can make contributions. For comparison, see also Wikipedia: Why Wikipedia is not so great, and Wikipedia: Replies to common objections. You can ...