enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment ...

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R.G._&_G.R._Harris_Funeral...

    R.G. & G.R. Harris Funeral Homes Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), is a landmark [1] United States Supreme Court case which ruled that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects transgender people from employment discrimination.

  3. General Electric Co. v. Gilbert - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/General_Electric_Co._v...

    General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976), is a 1976 United States Supreme Court case authored by Chief Justice William Rehnquist concerning gender-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In a 6–3 decision, the Court held that pregnancy could reasonably be excluded from an employer's the disability ...

  4. Employment discrimination - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination

    The job position must then still be open post-rejection for a discrimination case to be made. In many cases the courts found it difficult to prove intentional discrimination, thus the disparate impact legal theory was added. It covers the more complicated side of discrimination where "some work criterion was fair in form but discriminatory in ...

  5. Employment discrimination law in the United States - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Employment_discrimination...

    The United States Constitution also prohibits discrimination by federal and state governments against their public employees. Discrimination in the private sector is not directly constrained by the Constitution, but has become subject to a growing body of federal and state law, including the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Federal ...

  6. Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swierkiewicz_v._Sorema_N._A.

    Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A., 534 U.S. 506 (2002), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on February 26, 2002. The Court held that for complaints in employment discrimination cases, a plaintiff is not required to allege specific facts that establish a prima facie case as required by the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting framework.

  7. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & Trust - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Watson_v._Fort_Worth_Bank...

    On certiorari, the United States Supreme Court vacated the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remanded the case for further proceedings. Seven members of the Court (1) agreed that disparate impact analysis may be applied to allegedly discriminatory subjective or discretionary employment practices, and (2) agreed regarding certain aspects of the evidentiary standards applicable in such case

  8. Espinoza v. Farah Manufacturing Co. - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Espinoza_v._Farah...

    Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co. , 414 U.S. 86 (1973), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court , which held that an employer's refusal to hire a person because he is not a United States citizen does not constitute employment discrimination on the basis of "national origin" in violation of §703 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .

  9. Reed v. Reed - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reed_v._Reed

    Reed v. Reed was the first major Supreme Court case that addressed that discrimination based on gender was unconstitutional because it denies equal protection. The director for the ACLU, Mel Wulf , and Ruth Bader Ginsburg wrote Sally Reed's brief.