enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. Absolute immunity - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Absolute_immunity

    In United States law, absolute immunity is a type of sovereign immunity for government officials that confers complete immunity from criminal prosecution and suits for damages, so long as officials are acting within the scope of their duties. [1]

  3. Jencks Act - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jencks_Act

    The Jencks Act was enacted by the United States Congress in response to the 1957 Supreme Court decision in Jencks v. United States, [5] in which the Court established various rules for the availability and production of statements of prosecution witnesses in federal criminal trials.

  4. Trump v. United States (2024) - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_v._United_States_(2024)

    United States, 603 U.S. 593 (2024), is a landmark decision [1] [2] of the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court determined that presidential immunity from criminal prosecution presumptively extends to all of a president's "official acts" – with absolute immunity for official acts within an exclusive presidential authority that ...

  5. Trump says he will attend federal appeals court arguments on ...

    www.aol.com/news/trump-says-attend-federal...

    "Of course I was entitled, as President of the United States and Commander in Chief, to Immunity," Trump said in the post. Prosecutors have accused Trump, the frontrunner for the 2024 Republican ...

  6. Special counsel goes directly to Supreme Court to resolve ...

    www.aol.com/news/special-counsel-goes-directly...

    Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to decide whether Donald Trump has any immunity from criminal prosecution for alleged crimes he ... 800-290-4726 more ways to reach us.

  7. The U.S. Bill of Rights. Article Three, Section Two, Clause Three of the United States Constitution provides that: . Trial of all Crimes, except in Cases of Impeachment, shall be by Jury; and such Trial shall be held in the State where the said Crimes shall have been committed; but when not committed within any State, the Trial shall be at such Place or Places as the Congress may by Law have ...

  8. Manhattan prosecutors blast Trump attempts to ‘malign and ...

    www.aol.com/manhattan-prosecutors-blast-trump...

    Manhattan prosecutors are urging the judge overseeing Donald Trump’s hush money trial to preserve the jury’s 34-count guilty verdict, even if it means postponing any sentencing until after his ...

  9. Napue v. Illinois - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napue_v._Illinois

    Napue v. Illinois, 360 U.S. 264 (1959), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the knowing use of false testimony by a prosecutor in a criminal case violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, even if the testimony affects only the credibility of the witness and does not directly relate to the innocence or guilt of ...