Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
When in Rome, do as the Romans do (Medieval Latin: Sī fuerīs Rōmae, Rōmānō vīvitō mōre; sī fuerīs alibī, vīvitō sīcut ibī), often shortened to when in Rome..., is a proverb attributed to Saint Ambrose. [1] [2] The proverb means that it is best to follow the traditions or customs of a place being visited.
"When in Rome (I Do as the Romans Do)", by Barbra Streisand from People, 1964; Other uses. When in Rome, a comedy tour by Alex Horne; See also.
The Roman Catechism adds that human concepts of heaven - living like a king, heaven being the most perfect paradise, one enjoying the ultimate union with God, the realization of one's potential and ideals, the achievement of godhood, materialistic fulfillment (wealth, power, feast, pleasure, leisure, etc.), eternal rest, reunion with loved ones ...
Cato argues that Rome should not annex Macedonia as Rome was incapable of properly defending it. Cato the Elder 167 BCE [20] [21] [22] De Pecuni Regis Antiochi: Cato's commentary on potential corruption involved in Scipio's triumph due to his campaign in Africa. Cato the Elder Uncertain date [23] [24] De Praeda militbus dividenda
Greeting to the church in Rome (preface) Request that the Christians in Rome not intervene to stop his martyrdom (1.1-3.3) Explanation of his suffering as union with Christ (4.1-8.1) Closing and farewell (8.2-10.3) [5] Clayton Jefford provides the following short summary of the epistle: "Greetings to the Romans! Though I am unworthy, I long to ...
The Roman Empire expanded to include different peoples and cultures; in principle, Rome followed the same inclusionist policies that had recognised Latin, Etruscan and other Italian peoples, cults and deities as Roman. Those who acknowledged Rome's hegemony retained their own cult and religious calendars, independent of Roman religious law. [168]
Get AOL Mail for FREE! Manage your email like never before with travel, photo & document views. Personalize your inbox with themes & tabs. You've Got Mail!
Another perspective sees Romans 1:26 as a blanket condemnation of unnatural heterosexual activity enduring to the present day, such as anal sex, [44] whereas Romans 1:27 is a blanket condemnation of male homosexual activity enduring to the present day. [45] A minority of scholars have suggested that Romans 1:26–27 is a non-Pauline interpolation.