Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Ricci v. DeStefano , 557 U.S. 557 (2009), is a United States labor law case of the United States Supreme Court on unlawful discrimination through disparate impact under the Civil Rights Act of 1964 .
Raytheon Co. v. Hernandez, 540 U.S. 44 (2003) Smith v. City of Jackson, 544 U.S. 228 (2005) — held the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 authorizes disparate impact lawsuits; Meacham v. Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, 554 U.S. 84 (2008) Ricci v. DeStefano, 557 U.S. 557 (2009) Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v.
This is a list of all the United States Supreme Court cases from volume 557 of the United States Reports: Case name Citation ... Ricci v. DeStefano: 557 U.S. 557: 2009:
Some background: In 1984, a unanimous 6-0 Supreme Court decision found that in the case of Chevron v. The Natural Resources Defense Council, when a statute is ambiguous, the courts should defer to ...
On Dec. 9, TikTok and parent company ByteDance asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to pause legislation that could ban the social media app in January, until the ...
Did not participate in the decision: Decisions that do not note an argument date were decided without oral argument. Decisions that do not note a Justice delivering the Court's opinion are per curiam. Multiple concurrences and dissents within a case are numbered, with joining votes numbered accordingly.
(The Center Square) – A unanimous ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court may pave the way for challenges to a federal deportation plan under the incoming Trump administration to be defeated. The ...
In his concurring opinion in Ricci v. DeStefano (2009), Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito singled out Kimber for having political motivations in his decision to set aside the results. This brought Kimber into the center of the controversy and led to mass media attention. [ 14 ]