Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The centre has two sets of rules that determine how cases will be initiated and conducted, either under the ICSID Convention, Regulations and Rules or the ICSID Additional Facility Rules. To be processed in accordance with the ICSID Convention, a legal dispute has to exist between one of the centre's contracting member states and a national of ...
The ICSID website has published awards for most completed arbitrations, [55] and decisions in investor-state arbitrations outside of ICSID are also publicly available online. On 1 April 2014, the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration entered into force. [56]
The ICSID Review—Foreign Investment Law Journal is a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal covering foreign investment law and international investment dispute settlement. Until 2011 it was published by the Johns Hopkins University Press on behalf of the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), an independent ...
Following ZF, in In re Alpene 2022 WL 15497008 (Oct. 27, 2022), the Eastern District of New York held that section 1782 discovery was not available in relation to an investor-State arbitration under the auspices of the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The Court found that there was “insufficient support ...
The ICSID Convention and ICSID Arbitration Rules are the most commonly-used arbitration rules for the settlement of investment disputes. The Algiers Declaration of 1981 established the Iran-US Claims Tribunal to adjudicate claims of American corporations and individuals in relation to expropriated property during the Islamic revolution in Iran ...
Man accused of trying to smuggle meth-caked clothing on ...
1 1/4 c. Preheat oven to 350° and line a large baking sheet with parchment. In a food processor, pulse flour, powdered sugar, cornstarch, baking powder, and salt a few times to combine. Add ...
The Philip Morris v.Uruguay case (Spanish: Caso Philip Morris contra Uruguay) was an investor-state dispute settlement case initiated on 19 February 2010 and concluded on 8 July 2016, in which the multinational tobacco company Philip Morris International (PMI), whose head office is located in Lausanne, [1] lodged a complaint against Uruguay that was resolved by international arbitration under ...