Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
The retrial took place on August 5, 1963, five months after the Supreme Court ruling. By destroying the credibility of the prosecution's key witness through exposing contradictions with other eyewitnesses and the witness's self-admittedly false statements (such as about his prior criminal record), Turner won an acquittal for Gideon.
The Brady doctrine is a pretrial discovery rule that was established by the United States Supreme Court in Brady v. Maryland (1963). [2] The rule requires that the prosecution must turn over all exculpatory evidence to the defendant in a criminal case.
[citation needed] The examiner must also provide the witness with the opportunity to adopt or reject the previous statement. [1] In the majority of U.S. jurisdictions, prior inconsistent statements may not be introduced to prove the truth of the prior statement itself, as this constitutes hearsay, but only to impeach the credibility of the witness.
Here's what's expected next in the case, which alleges that since 2009, the millionaire rap entrepreneur used force and threats to sexually abuse "women and others around him," including at drug ...
Mistaken identity – although the prosecution bears the burden of proving that a defendant has been properly identified, the defendant may still need to call into question the memory and credibility of witnesses claiming to have seen the commission of the crime. Alibi or mistaken identity defenses constitute "agency" defense—an argument that ...
Judge in Trump's classified docs case grants prosecutor's request to keep names of government witnesses secret Daniel Barnes and Megan Lebowitz and Lisa Rubin Updated April 9, 2024 at 7:39 PM
Willie Williams served nearly 45 years in prison for a Florida shooting he didn’t commit, lawyers say. Now, his conviction has been overturned.. Williams was sentenced to life in prison after a ...
If the witness were one that the party was required by law to call as a witness. If the witness surprised the party who called him by giving damaging testimony against that party. The rule has been eliminated in many jurisdictions. Under the US Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 607 permits any party to attack the credibility of any witness. [1]