Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U.S. 629 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to McGirt v. Oklahoma, decided in 2020.In McGirt, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Congress never properly disestablished the Indian reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes in Oklahoma when granting its statehood, and thus almost half the state was still considered to be Native American land.
The Supreme Court of Oklahoma is a court of appeal for non-criminal cases, one of the two highest judicial bodies in the U.S. state of Oklahoma, and leads the judiciary of Oklahoma, the judicial branch of the government of Oklahoma. [1] The Oklahoma Supreme Court meets in the Oklahoma Judicial Center, having previously met in the Oklahoma State ...
The court was established when Oklahoma achieved statehood in 1907, and was initially composed of five justices, with the state divided into a corresponding number of judicial districts. [1] In 1917, the court was expanded to nine justices, with the judicial districts being redrawn accordingly, and with the seats for the fourth and fives ...
“The Oklahoma Bar Association, big medical and others have had an outsized influence on the Oklahoma Supreme Court for a long time,” said Dave Bond is a spokesperson for the group, which ...
Bob Burke is an Oklahoma City constitutional lawyer, author and historian. He has written three books about the Oklahoma Supreme Court scandal of the 1960s.
Cooper v. Oklahoma, 517 U.S. 348 (1996), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court reversed an Oklahoma court decision holding that a defendant is presumed to be competent to stand trial unless he proves otherwise by the second highest legal standard of proof, that of clear and convincing evidence, ruling that to be unconstitutional. [1]
The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled on Friday to hear oral arguments on the Biden administration’s right to enforce two vaccine mandates that impact more than 100 million U.S. workers, and that ...
Zucht v. King, 260 U.S. 174 (1922), [1] was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in which the Court unanimously held that public schools could constitutionally exclude unvaccinated students from attending, even if there was not an ongoing outbreak. [2]