Ads
related to: north carolina traffic court case informationinfotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
thecountyoffice.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month
Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Heien v. North Carolina, 574 U.S. 54 (2014), was a decision by the United States Supreme Court, ruling that a police officer's reasonable mistake of law can provide the individualized suspicion required by the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution to justify a traffic stop. The Court delivered its ruling on December 15, 2014.
Prayer for Judgement Continued. Prayer For Judgement Continued is a judicial action unique to the U.S. state of North Carolina, allowing traffic violators and some misdemeanor offenders to plead guilty to an offense and then ask for a "Prayer For Judgement" from the judge. [1] If granted, the offense is not entered against the defendant.
Packingham v. North Carolina, 582 U.S. 98 (2017), is a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that a North Carolina statute that prohibited registered sex offenders from using social media websites was unconstitutional because it violated the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects freedom of speech.
The murder of Samantha Josephson, a student at University of South Carolina, in Columbia, South Carolina, occurred on March 29, 2019. [ 3] Josephson, 21, had ordered an Uber and mistakenly entered a car that she thought was her ride. Nathaniel Rowland, the driver of the car, used childproof locks to prevent Josephson from leaving the vehicle ...
North Carolina was the first state in the country to require the release of all traffic stop data starting in 2000. [48] Researchers have analysed 20 million traffic stops from this data finding that African Americans as a share of the population were twice as likely to be pulled over than whites and four times as likely to be searched.
Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 (1992), was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States.. The court held that the 8 + 1 ⁄ 2 year delay between Doggett's indictment and actual arrest violated his Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial, arguing that the government had been negligent in pursuing him and that Doggett had remained unaware of the indictment until his arrest.
The United States District Court for the District of North Carolina was established on June 4, 1790, by 1 Stat. 126. [3] [4] On June 9, 1794 it was subdivided into three districts by 1 Stat. 395, [4] but on March 3, 1797, the three districts were abolished and the single District restored by 1 Stat. 517, [4] until April 29, 1802, when the state was again subdivided into three different ...
The Superior Court is North Carolina's oldest court. [ 1] It was established by a law passed on November 15, 1777, which created a "Superior Court" system with six districts, with its main duty to serve as a trial court. Under the terms of the state constitution, the court's judges were elected by the North Carolina General Assembly and served ...
Ads
related to: north carolina traffic court case informationinfotracer.com has been visited by 10K+ users in the past month
thecountyoffice.com has been visited by 1M+ users in the past month