Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
There are different types of meetings though, and each have different rules. A work session is typically where the public body will get together to discuss one or just a few small items specifically.
The decisions made by members present at a meeting are the official acts in the name of the organization. [2] [6] According to RONR, this rule is considered to be a "fundamental principle of parliamentary law". [11] Exceptions for absentee voting would have to be expressly provided for in the organization's rules. [14]
State statutes typically do not prescribe a particular parliamentary authority to be used in corporate meetings. For instance, the Davis-Stirling Act, a California statute, provides that certain business meetings "shall be conducted in accordance with a recognized system of parliamentary procedure or any parliamentary procedures the association may adopt."
Kickoff meeting, the first meeting with a project team and the client of the project to discuss the role of each team-member [5] Town hall meeting, an informal public gathering. Work meeting, which produces a product or intangible result such as a decision; [6] compare working group. Board meeting, a meeting of the board of directors of an ...
Parliamentary procedures are the accepted rules, ethics, and customs governing meetings of an assembly or organization. Their object is to allow orderly deliberation upon questions of interest to the organization and thus to arrive at the sense or the will of the majority of the assembly upon these questions. [1]
Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised describes the following types of meetings: Regular meeting – a meeting normally scheduled by the organization at set intervals. [9] [10] For example, it could be a weekly or monthly meeting of the organization. Special meeting – a meeting scheduled separately from a regular meeting, as the need arises ...
There are currently forty-five rules, with the latest revision adopted on January 24, 2013. [1] The most recent addition of a new rule occurred in 2006, when The Legislative Transparency and Accountability Act of 2006 introduced a 44th rule on earmarks. The stricter rules are often waived by unanimous consent.
The rule was created in 1927 and refined in 1992. Since its most recent refinement in 2002, the rule states: [1] When a meeting, or part thereof, is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed.