Search results
Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
Good books on critical thinking commonly contain sections on fallacies, and some may be listed below. DiCarlo, Christopher (2011). How to Become a Really Good Pain in the Ass: A Critical Thinker's Guide to Asking the Right Questions. Prometheus Books. ISBN 9781616143978. Engel, S. Morris (1994). Fallacies and Pitfalls of Language: The Language ...
Material fallacies are not logical errors because the conclusion follows from the premises. He then divided the logical group into two groups: purely logical and semi-logical. The semi-logical group included all of Aristotle's sophisms except ignoratio elenchi, petitio principii, and non causa pro causa, which are in the material group. [25]
The distinction between formal and informal fallacies is opposed by deductivists, who hold that deductive invalidity is the reason for all fallacies. [18] One way to explain that some fallacies do not seem to be deductively invalid is to hold that they contain various hidden assumptions, as is common for natural language arguments.
Taxonomy of Logical Fallacies; forall x: an introduction to formal logic, by P.D. Magnus, covers sentential and quantified logic; Translation Tips, by Peter Suber, for translating from English into logical notation; Math & Logic: The history of formal mathematical, logical, linguistic and methodological ideas. In The Dictionary of the History ...
Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more
An argument that commits the ambiguous middle fallacy blurs the line between formal and informal (material) fallacies, however it is usually considered an informal fallacy because the argument's form appears valid. [5]
Note that modern formal interpretations of English sentences interpret 'every A is B ' as 'for any x, a statement that x is A implies a statement that x is B ', which does not imply 'some x is A'. This is a matter of semantic interpretation, however, and does not mean, as is sometimes claimed, that Aristotelian logic is 'wrong'.
Pages for logged out editors learn more. Contributions; Talk; List of logical fallacies