enow.com Web Search

Search results

  1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network
  2. False statements of fact - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_statements_of_fact

    The legal rule itself – how to apply this exception – is complicated, as it is often dependent on who said the statement and which actor it was directed towards. [6] The analysis is thus different if the government or a public figure is the target of the false statement (where the speech may get more protection) than a private individual who is being attacked over a matter of their private ...

  3. Defamation - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

    Defamation is a communication that injures a third party's reputation and causes a legally redressable injury. The precise legal definition of defamation varies from country to country. It is not necessarily restricted to making assertions that are falsifiable, and can extend to concepts that are more abstract than reputation – like dignity ...

  4. Philadelphia Newspapers v. Hepps - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Newspapers_v...

    Maurice S. Hepps was the principal stockholder of a corporation that had a chain of stores selling beer, soft drinks, and snacks.The Philadelphia Inquirer published a series of articles on Hepps being linked to organized crime and using some of those links to influence the State’s governmental processes.

  5. English defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_defamation_law

    A defamatory statement is presumed to be false, unless the defendant can prove its truth. English defamation law puts the burden of proof on the defendant, and does not require the plaintiff to prove falsehood. For that reason, it has been considered an impediment to free speech in much of the developed world.

  6. Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chaplinsky_v._New_Hampshire

    Certain "well-defined and narrowly limited" categories of speech fall outside the bounds of constitutional protection. Thus, "the lewd and obscene, the profane, the slanderous", and (in this case) insulting or "fighting" words neither contributed to the expression of ideas nor possessed any "social value" in the search for truth. [4] Murphy wrote:

  7. Opinion - California’s deepfake ban can’t fool the deep ...

    www.aol.com/opinion-california-deepfake-ban-t...

    Lyon’s arrest sparked a severe backlash, and free speech won the day. The wildly unpopular acts were later repealed or allowed to expire. The illiberal legacy of the acts remain a stain on Adams ...

  8. United States defamation law - Wikipedia

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_defamation_law

    Truth is an absolute defense against defamation in the United States, [1] meaning true statements cannot be defamatory. [ 2 ] Most states recognize that some categories of false statements are considered to be defamatory per se , such that people making a defamation claim for these statements do not need to prove that the statement caused them ...

  9. These Cookies Will Convert Anyone Into a Fruitcake Fan - AOL

    www.aol.com/cookies-convert-anyone-fruitcake-fan...

    Yields: 24-30. Prep Time: 1 hour. Total Time: 2 hours. Ingredients. Cookies. 2 c. all-purpose flour. 3/4 tsp. baking soda. 1/2 tsp. ground cinnamon. 1/4 tsp. baking ...