enow.com Web Search

Search results

1. Results from the WOW.Com Content Network

2. DO-178C - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DO-178C

   The flexible nature of DO-178C's processes and entry/exit criteria make it difficult to implement the first time, because these aspects are abstract and there is no "base set" of activities from which to work. The intention of DO-178C was not to be prescriptive. There are many possible and acceptable ways for a real project to define these aspects.

3. AC 20-115 - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AC_20-115

   The Advisory Circular AC 20-115( ), Airborne Software Development Assurance Using EUROCAE ED-12( ) and RTCA DO-178( ) (previously Airborne Software Assurance), recognizes [1] the RTCA published standard DO-178 as defining a suitable means for demonstrating compliance for the use of software within aircraft systems.

4. Software safety - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_safety

   Various standards suggest different levels, e.g. Software Levels A-E in DO-178C, [4] SIL (Safety Integrity Level) 1-4 in IEC 61508, [1] ASIL (Automotive Safety Integrity Level) A-D in ISO 26262. [2] The assignment is typically done in the context of an overarching system, where the worst case consequences of software failures are investigated.

5. Radio Technical Commission for Aeronautics - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Technical_Commission...

   Many of RTCA documents begin with the letters DO which stands for DOcument. RTCA develops Minimum Operating Performance Standards for aviation-based technology (typically avionics) but has developed standards for such far-ranging topics as Airport Security, Counter UAS Detection standards, and Aircraft Cockpit and Cabin Cleaning standards.

6. Category:RTCA standards - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:RTCA_standards

   Main page; Contents; Current events; Random article; About Wikipedia; Contact us; Pages for logged out editors learn more

7. Modified condition/decision coverage - Wikipedia

   en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/...

   It is a misunderstanding that by purely syntactic rearrangements of decisions (breaking them into several independently evaluated conditions using temporary variables, the values of which are then used in the decision) which do not change the semantics of a program can lower the difficulty of obtaining complete MC/DC coverage.